Difference between revisions of "Is it too late?"

From Matriarchist Party
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Our civilization is at stake)
m
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The world we leave to our children is particularly scary. Unlike our grandparents and great grandparents, we are far from believing to offer our grandchildren a better world. In fact, it is actually rather the opposite that unfolds before our eyes and to our conscience. If major and profound changes in our way of life do not take place in the very near future, which unfortunately is less and less likely, our world is doomed to suffer major disasters.
+
The world we leave to our children is particularly scary. Unlike our grandparents and great-grandparents, we are far from believing to offer our grandchildren a better world. In fact, it is actually rather the opposite that unfolds before our eyes and to our conscience. If major and profound changes in our way of life do not take place in the very near future, which unfortunately is less and less likely, our world is doomed to suffer major disasters.
  
 
==Our civilization is at stake==
 
==Our civilization is at stake==
Line 7: Line 7:
 
  « Many writers and researchers warn those who mistakenly believe that development and growth are synonymous » (loose translation)<br />
 
  « Many writers and researchers warn those who mistakenly believe that development and growth are synonymous » (loose translation)<br />
 
Original quote: « Plusieurs auteurs et chercheurs mettent en garde ceux qui croient qu’à tort, développement et croissance sont synonymes » (p. 12)<br />
 
Original quote: « Plusieurs auteurs et chercheurs mettent en garde ceux qui croient qu’à tort, développement et croissance sont synonymes » (p. 12)<br />
[http://www.prof-turchany.eu/documents/DD_fr_Evolution_conceptuelle_et_historique_du_DD.pdf ''Guy Turchany'', Évolution conceptuelle du développement durable, le chemin vers un oxymore?<br /> Université Internationale du Développement Durable (UIDD)]
+
[http://www.eco-logic.hu/prof-turchany/documents/DD_fr_Evolution_conceptuelle_et_historique_du_DD.pdf ''Guy Turchany'', Évolution conceptuelle du développement durable, le chemin vers un oxymore?<br /> Université Internationale du Développement Durable (UIDD) (visited July 23rd, 2018)]
 
</ref>,  
 
</ref>,  
 
continues to wreak havoc. We are heading straight towards crises of unprecedented magnitude. The only unknown is whether they will first be economic, social
 
continues to wreak havoc. We are heading straight towards crises of unprecedented magnitude. The only unknown is whether they will first be economic, social
 
<ref>
 
<ref>
 
  « Despite the diversity of viewpoints and perspectives presented within this volume, all of the contributors ultimately come to the same conclusion: humanity is at the crossroads of the most serious economic and social crisis in modern history. »<br />
 
  « Despite the diversity of viewpoints and perspectives presented within this volume, all of the contributors ultimately come to the same conclusion: humanity is at the crossroads of the most serious economic and social crisis in modern history. »<br />
[https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-global-economic-crisis/20425 ''Michel Chossudovsky and Andrew Gavin Marshall'', preface of the book The Global Economic Crisis, The Great Depression of the XXI Century<br /> GlobalResearch.ca, 18 mai 2010]
+
[https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-global-economic-crisis/20425 ''Michel Chossudovsky and Andrew Gavin Marshall'', preface of the book The Global Economic Crisis, The Great Depression of the XXI Century<br /> GlobalResearch.ca, May 18th, 2010 (visited July 23rd, 2018)]
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
 
or environmental
 
or environmental
 
<ref>
 
<ref>
 
  « We are concerned that if governments in Canada don’t steer the course of economic and social development, the next generation of citizens will face dire consequences of extreme warming. » (p. 15)<br /> « The  real-world  consequences  of  these  climate  projections  can  be  comprehended  by  thinking  of  past climate-related disasters such as the 2013 floods in Toronto and Calgary, the record drought in 2012 that greatly  impacted  the  agricultural  sector,  Hurricane  Juan  that  ripped  up  Halifax  in  2003,  and  the  1998 ice storm that left 1.2 million Canadians in Ontario and Québec in the dark for a week in January. » (p. 17)<br />
 
  « We are concerned that if governments in Canada don’t steer the course of economic and social development, the next generation of citizens will face dire consequences of extreme warming. » (p. 15)<br /> « The  real-world  consequences  of  these  climate  projections  can  be  comprehended  by  thinking  of  past climate-related disasters such as the 2013 floods in Toronto and Calgary, the record drought in 2012 that greatly  impacted  the  agricultural  sector,  Hurricane  Juan  that  ripped  up  Halifax  in  2003,  and  the  1998 ice storm that left 1.2 million Canadians in Ontario and Québec in the dark for a week in January. » (p. 17)<br />
[http://biology.mcgill.ca/unesco/EN_Fullreport.pdf ''By 31 Canadian scholars'', Acting on Climate Change: Solutions from Canadian Scholars<br />Sustainable Canada Dialogues, March 19, 2015]
+
[http://www.sustainablecanadadialogues.ca/files/PDF_DOCS/SDC_EN_30marchlr.pdf ''By 31 Canadian scholars'', Acting on Climate Change: Solutions from Canadian Scholars<br />Sustainable Canada Dialogues, March 19, 2015 (visited July 23rd, 2018)]
 
</ref>.  
 
</ref>.  
  
L’horloge de la fin du monde (Doomsdays Clock) indique depuis le 22 janvier 2015 qu’il est minuit moins 3! Confirmé au début de 2016, il s’agit de l’avertissement le plus sévère de cet outil de la communauté scientifique internationale, depuis qu’il tient compte de la menace des changements climatiques.
+
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Doomsdays Clock indicates since January 25, 2018, that it is now two minutes to midnight! This is the strongest warning of this tool from the international scientific community, the clock's closest approach to midnight since its inception, matched only once in 1953, during the worst days of the nuclear threat
 
<ref>
 
<ref>
« Minuit moins trois est trop serré. Beaucoup trop serré. Nous, les membres du conseil sur la science et la sécurité du Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, désirons être clairs à propos de notre décision de ne pas bouger l’aiguille de l'horloge de la fin du monde en 2016 : Cette décision n’est pas une bonne nouvelle, mais une expression de consternation face aux dirigeants du monde qui continuent de détourner leurs efforts et l'attention du monde devant l'extrême danger que représentent les armes nucléaires et les changements climatiques. En qualifiant ces dangers d’existentiels, nous affirmons plus exactement ceci : Ils menacent l'existence même de la civilisation et devraient donc constituer le premier item à l’ordre du jour pour les dirigeants qui se soucient de leurs électeurs et de leurs pays. » (traduction libre)<br />
+
« The Science and Security Board hopes this resetting of the Clock will be interpreted exactly as it is meant—as an urgent warning of global danger. The time for world leaders to address looming nuclear danger and the continuing march of climate change is long past. The time for the citizens of the world to demand such action is now: #rewindtheDoomsdayClock. »<br />
Texte original : « Three minutes (to midnight) is too close. Far too close. We, the members of the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, want to be clear about our decision not to move the hands of the Doomsday Clock in 2016 : That decision is not good news, but an expression of dismay that world leaders continue to fail to focus their efforts and the world's attention on reducing the extreme danger posed by nuclear weapons and climate change. When we call these dangers existential, that is exactly what we mean : They threaten the very existence of civilization and therefore should be the first order of business for leaders who care about their constituents and their countries. »<br />
+
[https://cdn.thebulletin.org/sites/default/files/2018%20Doomsday%20Clock%20Statement.pdf ''by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Science and security board'', It is 2 minutes to midnight<br /> Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January 25th, 2018 (visited July 23rd, 2018)]
[http://thebulletin.org/press-release/doomsday-clock-hands-remain-unchanged-despite-iran-deal-and-paris-talks9122 ''Par les membres du conseil sur la science et la sécurité du Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists'', Doomsday Clock hands remain unchanged, despite Iran deal and Paris talks<br /> Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 26 janvier 2016]
+
</ref>.
</ref>
 
 
   
 
   
Notre civilisation est-elle vraiment condamnée à s’effondrer d’ici quelques décennies, faute de mieux que le «moins mauvais des systèmes politiques» tel que le qualifiait Winston Churchill?
+
Is our civilization really doomed to collapse in a few decades, for want of anything better than the "least bad political system" as described by Winston Churchill?
  
===Survivre au XXIe siècle?===
+
===Surviving the 21st century?===
  
Depuis plusieurs années, les constats de l’impasse dans laquelle nous nous trouvons se multiplient. Parfois on mentionne timidement le fait que nous sommes bel et bien entrés dans un siècle nouveau. L’expression «digne du XXIe siècle» est évoquée parfois, pour appuyer le fait que nous méritons mieux, beaucoup mieux. En fait, la situation actuelle nous force à nous poser cette question existentielle : Est-ce que notre civilisation sera en mesure de survivre au XXIe siècle? Ou plus invraisemblable encore, d’entamer sereinement ce 3ième millénaire, qui semblait pourtant plein de promesses, il y a à peine quelques décennies?
+
For several years, the findings of the stalemate in which we find ourselves are multiplying. Sometimes it is timidly mentioned that we have indeed entered a new century. The prefix "21st century" is sometimes added to a topic, to support the fact that we deserve better, much better. In fact, the current situation forces us to ask ourselves this existential question: Will our civilization be able to survive the twenty-first century? Or even more improbable, to start serenely this 3rd millennium, which seemed so full of promise, just a few decades ago?
  
===Remettre en question notre mode de vie===
+
===Challenging our way of life===
  
Il est peut-être déjà trop tard. Nous croyons que non. Mais il est bien sûr impossible de répondre avec certitude à cette question. Toutefois, il est évident que le temps presse et que les actions encourageantes de notre classe dirigeante sont rarissimes. Continuer de saupoudrer des changements mineurs ici et là serait faire preuve d'inconscience. On dirait que la communauté scientifique ne sait plus comment nous le dire. Les messages de deux de nos plus imposantes têtes d’affiche du monde scientifique, sont sans équivoque quant à l’urgence de trouver de nouvelles pistes fondamentalement différentes de celles que nous avons explorées jusqu'ici. D’un côté, David Suzuki constate que « l’environnementalisme a échoué »<ref>[http://www.davidsuzuki.org/fr/blogues/la-science-en-action/2012/05/-lechec-fondamental-de-lenvironnementalisme/ L'échec fondamental de l'environnementalisme <br /> ''David Suzuki'', 23 mai 2012]
+
It may be too late already. We believe not. But it is, of course, impossible to answer this question with certainty. However, it is obvious that time is running out and that the encouraging actions of our ruling class are extremely rare. To continue to sprinkle minor changes here and there would be unconscious. It seems that the scientific community does not know more how to tell us. The messages of two of our biggest headliners in the scientific world are unequivocal about the urgency of finding new paths fundamentally different from those we have explored so far. On the one hand, David Suzuki finds that "environmentalism has failed"
 +
<ref>[https://www.straight.com/article-674101/vancouver/david-suzuki-fundamental-failure-environmentalism The fundamental failure of environmentalism <br /> ''David Suzuki'', May 1st, 2012 (visited July 23rd, 2018)]
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
, de l’autre Hubert Reeves nous dit clairement que la survie même de notre civilisation est en jeu
+
, on the other, Hubert Reeves clearly tells us that the very survival of our civilization is at stake
 
<ref>
 
<ref>
« Oui, l’humanité est malheureusement menacée. Il faut vraiment être aveugle pour en douter… » <br />
+
« Yes, humanity is unfortunately threatened. You really have to be blind to doubt it » (loose translation) <br />
[https://fr.news.yahoo.com/le-grand-entretien-hubert-reeves-nous-ne-savons-pas-a-quoi-ressemblera-cette-planete-dans-50-ans-102406310.html ''Hubert Reeves'', Entretien<br />M6 Info]
+
Original quote: « Oui, l’humanité est malheureusement menacée. Il faut vraiment être aveugle pour en douter… » <br />
</ref>. Et trop peu de choses semblent actuellement se mettre en place pour éviter le pire. Nous croyons donc légitime de remettre en question plusieurs des aspects fondamentaux de notre mode de vie.
+
[https://fr.news.yahoo.com/le-grand-entretien-hubert-reeves-nous-ne-savons-pas-a-quoi-ressemblera-cette-planete-dans-50-ans-102406310.html ''Hubert Reeves'', Entretien<br />M6 Info (visited July 23rd, 2018)]
 +
</ref>. And too little seems to be in place to avoid the worst. We, therefore, believe that it is legitimate to question many fundamental aspects of our way of life.
  
<strong>Chapitre suivant : [[Vivre en Matriarchie‎]]</strong><br />
+
<strong>Next chapter: [[Living in Matriarchy‎]]</strong><br />
<strong>[[Accueil]]</strong>
+
<strong>[[Main Page]]</strong>
  
== Références ==
+
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Latest revision as of 17:41, 16 November 2018

The world we leave to our children is particularly scary. Unlike our grandparents and great-grandparents, we are far from believing to offer our grandchildren a better world. In fact, it is actually rather the opposite that unfolds before our eyes and to our conscience. If major and profound changes in our way of life do not take place in the very near future, which unfortunately is less and less likely, our world is doomed to suffer major disasters.

Our civilization is at stake

Uninterrupted growth, cleverly disguised in the shadow of sustainable development [1], continues to wreak havoc. We are heading straight towards crises of unprecedented magnitude. The only unknown is whether they will first be economic, social [2] or environmental [3].

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Doomsdays Clock indicates since January 25, 2018, that it is now two minutes to midnight! This is the strongest warning of this tool from the international scientific community, the clock's closest approach to midnight since its inception, matched only once in 1953, during the worst days of the nuclear threat [4].

Is our civilization really doomed to collapse in a few decades, for want of anything better than the "least bad political system" as described by Winston Churchill?

Surviving the 21st century?

For several years, the findings of the stalemate in which we find ourselves are multiplying. Sometimes it is timidly mentioned that we have indeed entered a new century. The prefix "21st century" is sometimes added to a topic, to support the fact that we deserve better, much better. In fact, the current situation forces us to ask ourselves this existential question: Will our civilization be able to survive the twenty-first century? Or even more improbable, to start serenely this 3rd millennium, which seemed so full of promise, just a few decades ago?

Challenging our way of life

It may be too late already. We believe not. But it is, of course, impossible to answer this question with certainty. However, it is obvious that time is running out and that the encouraging actions of our ruling class are extremely rare. To continue to sprinkle minor changes here and there would be unconscious. It seems that the scientific community does not know more how to tell us. The messages of two of our biggest headliners in the scientific world are unequivocal about the urgency of finding new paths fundamentally different from those we have explored so far. On the one hand, David Suzuki finds that "environmentalism has failed" [5] , on the other, Hubert Reeves clearly tells us that the very survival of our civilization is at stake [6]. And too little seems to be in place to avoid the worst. We, therefore, believe that it is legitimate to question many fundamental aspects of our way of life.

Next chapter: Living in Matriarchy‎
Main Page

References

  1. « Many writers and researchers warn those who mistakenly believe that development and growth are synonymous » (loose translation)
    Original quote: « Plusieurs auteurs et chercheurs mettent en garde ceux qui croient qu’à tort, développement et croissance sont synonymes » (p. 12)
    Guy Turchany, Évolution conceptuelle du développement durable, le chemin vers un oxymore?
    Université Internationale du Développement Durable (UIDD) (visited July 23rd, 2018)
  2. « Despite the diversity of viewpoints and perspectives presented within this volume, all of the contributors ultimately come to the same conclusion: humanity is at the crossroads of the most serious economic and social crisis in modern history. »
    Michel Chossudovsky and Andrew Gavin Marshall, preface of the book The Global Economic Crisis, The Great Depression of the XXI Century
    GlobalResearch.ca, May 18th, 2010 (visited July 23rd, 2018)
  3. « We are concerned that if governments in Canada don’t steer the course of economic and social development, the next generation of citizens will face dire consequences of extreme warming. » (p. 15)
    « The real-world consequences of these climate projections can be comprehended by thinking of past climate-related disasters such as the 2013 floods in Toronto and Calgary, the record drought in 2012 that greatly impacted the agricultural sector, Hurricane Juan that ripped up Halifax in 2003, and the 1998 ice storm that left 1.2 million Canadians in Ontario and Québec in the dark for a week in January. » (p. 17)
    By 31 Canadian scholars, Acting on Climate Change: Solutions from Canadian Scholars
    Sustainable Canada Dialogues, March 19, 2015 (visited July 23rd, 2018)
  4. « The Science and Security Board hopes this resetting of the Clock will be interpreted exactly as it is meant—as an urgent warning of global danger. The time for world leaders to address looming nuclear danger and the continuing march of climate change is long past. The time for the citizens of the world to demand such action is now: #rewindtheDoomsdayClock. »
    by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Science and security board, It is 2 minutes to midnight
    Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January 25th, 2018 (visited July 23rd, 2018)
  5. The fundamental failure of environmentalism
    David Suzuki, May 1st, 2012 (visited July 23rd, 2018)
  6. « Yes, humanity is unfortunately threatened. You really have to be blind to doubt it » (loose translation)
    Original quote: « Oui, l’humanité est malheureusement menacée. Il faut vraiment être aveugle pour en douter… »
    Hubert Reeves, Entretien
    M6 Info (visited July 23rd, 2018)